COIN
Price
$283.14
Change
-$20.86 (-6.86%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
76.35B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUT
Price
$36.02
Change
-$5.71 (-13.68%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.89B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COIN vs HUT

Header iconCOIN vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts COIN vs HUTBanner chart's image
Coinbase Global
Price$283.14
Change-$20.86 (-6.86%)
Volume$11.11M
Capitalization76.35B
Hut 8
Price$36.02
Change-$5.71 (-13.68%)
Volume$12.29M
Capitalization3.89B
COIN vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COIN vs. HUT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COIN is a Hold and HUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (COIN: $304.00 vs. HUT: $41.73)
Brand notoriety: COIN and HUT are both not notable
COIN represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while HUT is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COIN: 74% vs. HUT: 92%
Market capitalization -- COIN: $76.35B vs. HUT: $3.89B
COIN [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $76.35B. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $152.3B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.21B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than COIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than COIN.

Price Growth

COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -11.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

COIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.54% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($76.3B) has a higher market cap than HUT($3.89B). COIN has higher P/E ratio than HUT: COIN (24.47) vs HUT (18.57). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 103.660 vs. COIN (22.433). COIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.69B vs. HUT (367M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 9.55B vs. HUT (216M). HUT has less debt than COIN: HUT (362M) vs COIN (4.41B). COIN has higher revenues than HUT: COIN (7.01B) vs HUT (550M).
COINHUTCOIN / HUT
Capitalization76.3B3.89B1,961%
EBITDA3.69B367M1,004%
Gain YTD22.433103.66022%
P/E Ratio24.4718.57132%
Revenue7.01B550M1,274%
Total Cash9.55B216M4,420%
Total Debt4.41B362M1,218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COINHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEYAX10.710.15
+1.42%
Macquarie Climate Solutions A
SMVZX13.740.05
+0.37%
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6
BSPAX801.540.53
+0.07%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A
FIQOX40.98N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Z
GSBDX16.39-0.08
-0.49%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth A

COIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COIN
1D Price
Change %
COIN100%
-0.00%
AFRM - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
+5.07%
MSTR - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
RIOT - COIN
77%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
U - COIN
74%
Closely correlated
-3.38%
HOOD - COIN
73%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-4.96%
RIOT - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
CIFR - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-6.91%
IREN - HUT
73%
Closely correlated
-2.93%
HIVE - HUT
71%
Closely correlated
-11.26%
COIN - HUT
71%
Closely correlated
-0.00%
More