COIN
Price
$283.14
Change
-$20.86 (-6.86%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
76.35B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GTLB
Price
$43.97
Change
-$2.48 (-5.34%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.33B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COIN vs GTLB

Header iconCOIN vs GTLB Comparison
Open Charts COIN vs GTLBBanner chart's image
Coinbase Global
Price$283.14
Change-$20.86 (-6.86%)
Volume$11.11M
Capitalization76.35B
GitLab
Price$43.97
Change-$2.48 (-5.34%)
Volume$3.3M
Capitalization7.33B
COIN vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COIN vs. GTLB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COIN is a Hold and GTLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (COIN: $283.14 vs. GTLB: $43.97)
Brand notoriety: COIN and GTLB are both not notable
COIN represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while GTLB is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COIN: 117% vs. GTLB: 77%
Market capitalization -- COIN: $76.35B vs. GTLB: $7.33B
COIN [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $76.35B. GTLB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $7.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $152.3B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.74T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTLB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COIN and GTLB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GTLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than COIN.

Price Growth

COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -4.09% price change this week, while GTLB (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

COIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.32% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Computer Communications (-1.87% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($76.3B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($7.33B). GTLB has higher P/E ratio than COIN: GTLB (521.22) vs COIN (24.47). COIN YTD gains are higher at: 22.433 vs. GTLB (-17.569). COIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.69B vs. GTLB (-89.8M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 9.55B vs. GTLB (1.17B). GTLB has less debt than COIN: GTLB (392K) vs COIN (4.41B). COIN has higher revenues than GTLB: COIN (7.01B) vs GTLB (858M).
COINGTLBCOIN / GTLB
Capitalization76.3B7.33B1,041%
EBITDA3.69B-89.8M-4,104%
Gain YTD22.433-17.569-128%
P/E Ratio24.47521.225%
Revenue7.01B858M817%
Total Cash9.55B1.17B819%
Total Debt4.41B392K1,125,000%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COINGTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GTLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSEX15.400.05
+0.33%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Invmt
CWMFX67.290.21
+0.31%
American Funds Washington Mutual 529F1
NEFJX21.36-0.01
-0.05%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap A
SWLGX17.84-0.03
-0.17%
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Growth Idx
GUSYX20.29-0.05
-0.25%
Grandeur Peak US Stalwarts Institutional

COIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COIN
1D Price
Change %
COIN100%
-0.00%
AFRM - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
+5.07%
MSTR - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
RIOT - COIN
77%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
U - COIN
74%
Closely correlated
-3.38%
HOOD - COIN
73%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-0.17%
HUBS - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
TEAM - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
OKTA - GTLB
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
FIVN - GTLB
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
More