It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COGZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRAMP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COGZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
COGZF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while RAMP (@Computer Communications) price change was -17.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.10%.
RAMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Computer Communications (+0.92% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
COGZF | RAMP | COGZF / RAMP | |
Capitalization | 186M | 1.74B | 11% |
EBITDA | N/A | 40.2M | - |
Gain YTD | 76.000 | -12.875 | -590% |
P/E Ratio | 25.94 | 139.26 | 19% |
Revenue | N/A | 746M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 421M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 36.3M | - |
COGZF | RAMP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COGZF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as RAMP (86) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAMP (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as RAMP (91) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RAMP (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RAMP (97) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
COGZF | RAMP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SLVAX | 36.23 | 0.33 | +0.92% |
Columbia Select Large Cap Value A | |||
CRRRX | 14.40 | 0.11 | +0.77% |
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst2 | |||
ITEIX | 9.91 | 0.06 | +0.61% |
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income I | |||
LZSIX | 12.30 | 0.03 | +0.24% |
Lazard International Equity Select Instl | |||
OTCBX | 23.09 | -0.09 | -0.39% |
MFS Mid Cap Growth B |
A.I.dvisor tells us that COGZF and CIOXY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COGZF and CIOXY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COGZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COGZF | 100% | +1.85% | ||
CIOXY - COGZF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RAMP - COGZF | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
CMPD - COGZF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CNSWF - COGZF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
DASTF - COGZF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.56% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RAMP has been closely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RAMP jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RAMP | 100% | -4.82% | ||
FROG - RAMP | 67% Closely correlated | +12.45% | ||
EGHT - RAMP | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
FSLY - RAMP | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.30% | ||
FRSH - RAMP | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
GTLB - RAMP | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More |