COGZF
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
319.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ELWS
Price
$5.80
Change
+$0.58 (+11.11%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COGZF vs ELWS

Header iconCOGZF vs ELWS Comparison
Open Charts COGZF vs ELWSBanner chart's image
Cogstate
Price$2.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$260
Capitalization319.69M
Earlyworks
Price$5.80
Change+$0.58 (+11.11%)
Volume$65.94K
Capitalization17.69M
COGZF vs ELWS Comparison Chart in %
COGZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ELWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COGZF vs. ELWS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COGZF is a Buy and ELWS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (COGZF: $2.10 vs. ELWS: $5.80)
Brand notoriety: COGZF and ELWS are both not notable
COGZF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while ELWS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COGZF: 2% vs. ELWS: 8%
Market capitalization -- COGZF: $319.69M vs. ELWS: $17.69M
COGZF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $319.69M. ELWS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $17.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $47.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $294.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COGZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileELWS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COGZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ELWS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COGZF is a better buy in the long-term than ELWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COGZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELWS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COGZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ELWS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELWS is a better buy in the short-term than COGZF.

Price Growth

COGZF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +14.75% price change this week, while ELWS (@Packaged Software) price change was +53.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.82% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Packaged Software (-1.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COGZF($320M) has a higher market cap than ELWS($17.7M). COGZF YTD gains are higher at: 236.000 vs. ELWS (118.045). COGZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.9M vs. ELWS (-358.74M). ELWS has higher revenues than COGZF: ELWS (69.3M) vs COGZF (50.8M).
COGZFELWSCOGZF / ELWS
Capitalization320M17.7M1,808%
EBITDA16.9M-358.74M-5%
Gain YTD236.000118.045200%
P/E Ratio36.02N/A-
Revenue50.8M69.3M73%
Total Cash35.6MN/A-
Total Debt470KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COGZF: Fundamental Ratings
COGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COGZFELWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COGZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ELWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGRKX9.68-0.12
-1.22%
Principal Global Real Estate Sec R3
HSMBX38.30-0.61
-1.57%
Horizon Multi-Factor Small/Mid Cap Adv
RYTLX57.90-1.10
-1.86%
Rydex Telecommunications A
PRJCX41.62-1.13
-2.64%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities C
LFGTX41.92-1.39
-3.21%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R5

COGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COGZF and PRCH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COGZF and PRCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COGZF
1D Price
Change %
COGZF100%
N/A
PRCH - COGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
IMXI - COGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
LYFT - COGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
CIOXY - COGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELWS - COGZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
More

ELWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELWS has been loosely correlated with DTSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELWS jumps, then DTSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELWS
1D Price
Change %
ELWS100%
+11.11%
DTSS - ELWS
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.00%
LFMD - ELWS
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.88%
FRGE - ELWS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
LPSN - ELWS
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.09%
ADEA - ELWS
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.99%
More