COFS
Price
$35.45
Change
-$0.14 (-0.39%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:14 PM (EDT)
68 days until earnings call
SMBK
Price
$35.73
Change
-$0.49 (-1.35%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:33 PM (EDT)
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COFS vs SMBK

Header iconCOFS vs SMBK Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs SMBKBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$35.45
Change-$0.14 (-0.39%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
SmartFinancial
Price$35.73
Change-$0.49 (-1.35%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
COFS vs SMBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. SMBK commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a Hold and SMBK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (COFS: $35.59 vs. SMBK: $36.22)
Brand notoriety: COFS and SMBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 73% vs. SMBK: 62%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $206.57M vs. SMBK: $347.08M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $206.57M. SMBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $347.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the long-term than SMBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMBK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COFS and SMBK are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while SMBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBK($347M) has a higher market cap than COFS($207M). SMBK has higher P/E ratio than COFS: SMBK (12.09) vs COFS (9.50). SMBK YTD gains are higher at: 49.713 vs. COFS (25.120). COFS has more cash in the bank: 144M vs. SMBK (63M). SMBK has less debt than COFS: SMBK (50.1M) vs COFS (236M). SMBK has higher revenues than COFS: SMBK (152M) vs COFS (80.8M).
COFSSMBKCOFS / SMBK
Capitalization207M347M60%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.12049.71351%
P/E Ratio9.5012.0979%
Revenue80.8M152M53%
Total Cash144M63M229%
Total Debt236M50.1M471%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs SMBK: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
SMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4120
SMR RATING
1..100
3930
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COFS's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SMBK (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (41) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's SMR Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (39) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (39) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (29) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSSMBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been loosely correlated with CFFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then CFFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
-0.78%
CFFN - COFS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
SMBK - COFS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
MOFG - COFS
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
VABK - COFS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
HTBI - COFS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
+0.53%
FMBH - SMBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
SHBI - SMBK
83%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
OCFC - SMBK
83%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
FCBC - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
NWBI - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
More