COFS
Price
$31.90
Change
-$0.06 (-0.19%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
479.26M
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MVBF
Price
$27.84
Change
-$0.15 (-0.54%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
350.35M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs MVBF

Header iconCOFS vs MVBF Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs MVBFBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$31.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.19%)
Volume$128.97K
Capitalization479.26M
MVB Financial
Price$27.84
Change-$0.15 (-0.54%)
Volume$57.47K
Capitalization350.35M
COFS vs MVBF Comparison Chart in %
COFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. MVBF commentary
Dec 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a StrongBuy and MVBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 15, 2025
Stock price -- (COFS: $31.96 vs. MVBF: $27.99)
Brand notoriety: COFS and MVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 100% vs. MVBF: 160%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $479.26M vs. MVBF: $350.35M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $479.26M. MVBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $350.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMVBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MVBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MVBF is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MVBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MVBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than MVBF.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.04% price change this week, while MVBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

MVBF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COFS($479M) has a higher market cap than MVBF($350M). COFS has higher P/E ratio than MVBF: COFS (17.34) vs MVBF (11.36). MVBF YTD gains are higher at: 38.632 vs. COFS (-7.716). COFS has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. MVBF (6.7M). MVBF has less debt than COFS: MVBF (74M) vs COFS (246M). COFS has higher revenues than MVBF: COFS (143M) vs MVBF (133M).
COFSMVBFCOFS / MVBF
Capitalization479M350M137%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.71638.632-20%
P/E Ratio17.3411.36153%
Revenue143M133M108%
Total Cash155M6.7M2,315%
Total Debt246M74M332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs MVBF: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
MVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6267
SMR RATING
1..100
5350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MVBF's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (64) in the null industry. This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MVBF (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's SMR Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (53) in the null industry. This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (49) in the null industry. This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MVBF (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSMVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSFSX27.000.25
+0.93%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Value R6
UIVMX13.190.12
+0.92%
MFS Intrinsic Value R1
LICOX19.250.04
+0.21%
Lord Abbett International Equity F3
FRIOX11.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income C
SIEMX14.48-0.02
-0.14%
SEI Emerging Markets Equity F (SIT)

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
+0.22%
FISI - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
BY - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
HBNC - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
OSBC - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
FRME - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

MVBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVBF has been closely correlated with CVBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MVBF jumps, then CVBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MVBF
1D Price
Change %
MVBF100%
-1.34%
CVBF - MVBF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
PFIS - MVBF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
KRNY - MVBF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
COFS - MVBF
67%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
SHBI - MVBF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
More