COFS
Price
$29.35
Change
-$0.09 (-0.31%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
440.69M
24 days until earnings call
HBNC
Price
$16.20
Change
+$0.09 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
830.02M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs HBNC

Header iconCOFS vs HBNC Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs HBNCBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$29.35
Change-$0.09 (-0.31%)
Volume$41.11K
Capitalization440.69M
Horizon Ban
Price$16.20
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
Volume$217.33K
Capitalization830.02M
COFS vs HBNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. HBNC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a StrongBuy and HBNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (COFS: $29.35 vs. HBNC: $16.20)
Brand notoriety: COFS and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 63% vs. HBNC: 59%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $440.69M vs. HBNC: $830.02M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $440.69M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $830.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBNC is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than HBNC.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.13% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($830M) has a higher market cap than COFS($441M). COFS has higher P/E ratio than HBNC: COFS (18.23) vs HBNC (13.85). HBNC YTD gains are higher at: 3.792 vs. COFS (-15.253). COFS has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. HBNC (89.6M). COFS has less debt than HBNC: COFS (247M) vs HBNC (1.09B).
COFSHBNCCOFS / HBNC
Capitalization441M830M53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.2533.792-402%
P/E Ratio18.2313.85132%
RevenueN/A213M-
Total Cash155M89.6M173%
Total Debt247M1.09B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5961
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6563
SMR RATING
1..100
5332
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBNC's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (61) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (65) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (53) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (59) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBNC (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew significantly faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSHBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFMIX43.520.43
+1.00%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5
FNDMX13.670.11
+0.81%
Fidelity Series Sust Non-US Dev Mrkt Fd
MCGFX14.130.09
+0.64%
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
SOPVX53.320.29
+0.55%
Allspring Opportunity A
OAKLX85.020.46
+0.54%
Oakmark Select Investor

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
-0.31%
VLY - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
COLB - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
HBNC - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
ORRF - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UVSP - COFS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
More

HBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBNC
1D Price
Change %
HBNC100%
+0.56%
FMBH - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
UVSP - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
HFWA - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
TCBK - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
PEBO - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More