COFS
Price
$28.96
Change
+$0.13 (+0.45%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
434.66M
71 days until earnings call
HBNC
Price
$15.31
Change
+$0.09 (+0.59%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
670.6M
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs HBNC

Header iconCOFS vs HBNC Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs HBNCBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$28.96
Change+$0.13 (+0.45%)
Volume$42.59K
Capitalization434.66M
Horizon Ban
Price$15.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.59%)
Volume$129.17K
Capitalization670.6M
COFS vs HBNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. HBNC commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a Hold and HBNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (COFS: $28.96 vs. HBNC: $15.31)
Brand notoriety: COFS and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 36% vs. HBNC: 69%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $434.66M vs. HBNC: $670.6M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $434.66M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $670.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBNC is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HBNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than HBNC.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.75% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($671M) has a higher market cap than COFS($435M). COFS has higher P/E ratio than HBNC: COFS (17.99) vs HBNC (15.01). HBNC YTD gains are higher at: -1.910 vs. COFS (-17.151). COFS has more cash in the bank: 137M vs. HBNC (89.6M). COFS has less debt than HBNC: COFS (186M) vs HBNC (1.01B).
COFSHBNCCOFS / HBNC
Capitalization435M671M65%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.151-1.910898%
P/E Ratio17.9915.01120%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash137M89.6M153%
Total Debt186M1.01B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6362
SMR RATING
1..100
6335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
48n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBNC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (62) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (63) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (63) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (59) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBNC (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew significantly faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSHBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIKMX12.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Z
FIJZX52.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret Z
VWYFX41.53N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth A
AFCHX17.21-0.05
-0.29%
American Century Focused Intl Gr C
LRAGX16.11-0.10
-0.62%
Lord Abbett International Growth R3

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with COLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then COLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
+0.45%
COLB - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
HBNC - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
ASB - COFS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
ORRF - COFS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
UVSP - COFS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
More

HBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBNC
1D Price
Change %
HBNC100%
+0.59%
TCBK - HBNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
PEBO - HBNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
UVSP - HBNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
BRKL - HBNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
FMBH - HBNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More