COFS
Price
$31.63
Change
-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
476.25M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FHB
Price
$25.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.13B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs FHB

Header iconCOFS vs FHB Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs FHBBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$31.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Volume$3.84K
Capitalization476.25M
First Hawaiian
Price$25.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$25.54K
Capitalization3.13B
COFS vs FHB Comparison Chart in %
COFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. FHB commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a StrongBuy and FHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (COFS: $31.70 vs. FHB: $25.30)
Brand notoriety: COFS and FHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 119% vs. FHB: 95%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $476.25M vs. FHB: $3.13B
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $476.25M. FHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFHB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the short-term than COFS.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.59% price change this week, while FHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

FHB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($3.13B) has a higher market cap than COFS($476M). COFS has higher P/E ratio than FHB: COFS (17.23) vs FHB (12.34). FHB YTD gains are higher at: 0.552 vs. COFS (-8.467). FHB has more cash in the bank: 241M vs. COFS (155M). COFS (247M) and FHB (250M) have identical debt. FHB has higher revenues than COFS: FHB (794M) vs COFS (124M).
COFSFHBCOFS / FHB
Capitalization476M3.13B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.4670.552-1,535%
P/E Ratio17.2312.34140%
Revenue124M794M16%
Total Cash155M241M64%
Total Debt247M250M99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs FHB: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
FHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5949
SMR RATING
1..100
5315
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHB's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (62) in the null industry. This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (59) in the null industry. This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COFS (53) in the null industry. This means that FHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FHB (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHB (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSFHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRMSX23.710.21
+0.89%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index I
ABPYX13.150.07
+0.54%
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
CLPYX60.080.18
+0.30%
Columbia Large Cap Index Inst3
VFTAX65.700.16
+0.24%
Vanguard FTSE Social Index Admiral
SEBLX31.230.06
+0.19%
Touchstone Balanced A

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
+4.04%
BY - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
FISI - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
HBNC - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
OSBC - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
FHB - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
More

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
+1.24%
UBSI - FHB
89%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
FNB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
AUB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
UCB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
TRMK - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
More