COF
Price
$216.21
Change
+$0.78 (+0.36%)
Updated
Aug 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
137.77B
66 days until earnings call
WLFC
Price
$154.31
Change
-$2.69 (-1.71%)
Updated
Aug 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.2B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COF vs WLFC

Header iconCOF vs WLFC Comparison
Open Charts COF vs WLFCBanner chart's image
Capital One Financial
Price$216.21
Change+$0.78 (+0.36%)
Volume$26.73K
Capitalization137.77B
Willis Lease Finance
Price$154.31
Change-$2.69 (-1.71%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization1.2B
COF vs WLFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COF vs. WLFC commentary
Aug 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a Hold and WLFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 19, 2025
Stock price -- (COF: $215.43 vs. WLFC: $157.00)
Brand notoriety: COF: Notable vs. WLFC: Not notable
COF represents the Savings Banks, while WLFC is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 120% vs. WLFC: 44%
Market capitalization -- COF: $137.77B vs. WLFC: $1.2B
COF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $137.77B. WLFC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.6B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $58.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWLFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WLFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLFC is a better buy in the long-term than COF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLFC is a better buy in the short-term than COF.

Price Growth

COF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +3.74% price change this week, while WLFC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.26%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

WLFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.73% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.15% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COF($138B) has a higher market cap than WLFC($1.2B). COF has higher P/E ratio than WLFC: COF (598.42) vs WLFC (9.37). COF YTD gains are higher at: 21.888 vs. WLFC (-23.998). WLFC has less debt than COF: WLFC (2.23B) vs COF (51.9B).
COFWLFCCOF / WLFC
Capitalization138B1.2B11,500%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.888-23.998-91%
P/E Ratio598.429.376,388%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash4.85BN/A-
Total Debt51.9B2.23B2,325%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs WLFC: Fundamental Ratings
COF
WLFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2333
SMR RATING
1..100
247
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLFC's Valuation (33) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for COF (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WLFC’s stock grew significantly faster than COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WLFC (33) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to WLFC’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLFC (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLFC’s over the last 12 months.

WLFC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WLFC (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to WLFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFWLFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHIB.X0.000013N/A
+0.33%
Shiba Inu cryptocurrency
MBOX.X0.0603090.000068
+0.11%
MOBOX cryptocurrency
SFP.X0.4872450.000327
+0.07%
SafePal cryptocurrency
DIA.X0.736273-0.020948
-2.77%
DIA cryptocurrency
AMB.X0.000110-0.000004
-3.13%
Ascendia (ex AirDAO) cryptocurrency

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
-2.29%
SYF - COF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
AXP - COF
83%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
OMF - COF
81%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
BFH - COF
80%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
ENVA - COF
79%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
More

WLFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLFC has been loosely correlated with AER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLFC jumps, then AER could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLFC
1D Price
Change %
WLFC100%
-3.53%
AER - WLFC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
NNI - WLFC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
ENVA - WLFC
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
COF - WLFC
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
SYF - WLFC
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More