COF
Price
$226.36
Change
+$5.03 (+2.27%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
144.74B
48 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$43.75
Change
+$0.93 (+2.17%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
429.2M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COF vs RM

Header iconCOF vs RM Comparison
Open Charts COF vs RMBanner chart's image
Capital One Financial
Price$226.36
Change+$5.03 (+2.27%)
Volume$26.52K
Capitalization144.74B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$43.75
Change+$0.93 (+2.17%)
Volume$643
Capitalization429.2M
COF vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COF vs. RM commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a Buy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (COF: $221.33 vs. RM: $42.82)
Brand notoriety: COF: Notable vs. RM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 85% vs. RM: 139%
Market capitalization -- COF: $144.74B vs. RM: $429.2M
COF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $144.74B. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $429.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

COF (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COF($145B) has a higher market cap than RM($429M). COF has higher P/E ratio than RM: COF (628.67) vs RM (12.66). RM YTD gains are higher at: 29.454 vs. COF (25.226). COF has more cash in the bank: 4.85B vs. RM (4.27M). RM has less debt than COF: RM (1.55B) vs COF (51.9B).
COFRMCOF / RM
Capitalization145B429M33,800%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.22629.45486%
P/E Ratio628.6712.664,966%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash4.85B4.27M113,624%
Total Debt51.9B1.55B3,355%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
COF
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8130
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2252
SMR RATING
1..100
217
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5035

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COF (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RM (52) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RM (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RM (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

COF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFMAX36.780.26
+0.71%
Davidson Multi-Cap Equity A
RSEFX15.330.04
+0.26%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Svc
TFGRX46.190.03
+0.06%
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth R6
FIQCX29.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Z
WVMRX11.66-0.06
-0.51%
William Blair Mid Cap Value R6

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
-0.87%
SYF - COF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
AXP - COF
83%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
OMF - COF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
BFH - COF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
ENVA - COF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
-2.33%
ENVA - RM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
SYF - RM
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
ATLC - RM
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
COF - RM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
BFH - RM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More