CODGF vs CODYY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODGF is a Hold and CODYY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CODGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCODYY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CODGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CODYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
CODGF (@Building Products) experienced а +3.83% price change this week, while CODYY (@Building Products) price change was +2.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
CODYY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-0.57% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| CODGF | CODYY | CODGF / CODYY | |
| Capitalization | 34.5B | 34.5B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 6.04B | 7.19B | 84% |
| Gain YTD | 27.443 | 29.287 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.51 | 11.53 | 100% |
| Revenue | 42.5B | 51.2B | 83% |
| Total Cash | 6.21B | 6.21B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 14.7B | 14.7B | 100% |
CODGF | CODYY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CODGF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CODYY (27). This means that CODGF’s stock grew similarly to CODYY’s over the last 12 months.
CODYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CODGF (24). This means that CODYY’s stock grew similarly to CODGF’s over the last 12 months.
CODGF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CODYY (98). This means that CODGF’s stock grew similarly to CODYY’s over the last 12 months.
CODGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CODYY (45). This means that CODGF’s stock grew similarly to CODYY’s over the last 12 months.
CODGF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CODYY (56). This means that CODGF’s stock grew similarly to CODYY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CODGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CODGF and NIABY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CODGF and NIABY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CODGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NIABY - CODGF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CODYY - CODGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| SWIM - CODGF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| GBERY - CODGF | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| APEUF - CODGF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||
CODYY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CODYY has been loosely correlated with GBERY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CODYY jumps, then GBERY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CODYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODYY | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| GBERY - CODYY | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| DKILY - CODYY | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| WMS - CODYY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.58% | ||
| KGSPY - CODYY | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
| TOTDY - CODYY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||