CODAF
Price
$7.30
Change
-$0.56 (-7.12%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.28B
HXGBF
Price
$9.99
Change
-$0.56 (-5.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CODAF vs HXGBF

Header iconCODAF vs HXGBF Comparison
Open Charts CODAF vs HXGBFBanner chart's image
Codan
Price$7.30
Change-$0.56 (-7.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.28B
Hexagon AB
Price$9.99
Change-$0.56 (-5.31%)
Volume$156
Capitalization26.03B
CODAF vs HXGBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HXGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CODAF vs. HXGBF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODAF is a Hold and HXGBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CODAF: $7.30 vs. HXGBF: $9.99)
Brand notoriety: CODAF and HXGBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CODAF: 100% vs. HXGBF: 6%
Market capitalization -- CODAF: $1.28B vs. HXGBF: $26.03B
CODAF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $1.28B. HXGBF’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $26.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CODAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CODAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HXGBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CODAF is a better buy in the long-term than HXGBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HXGBF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HXGBF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CODAF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HXGBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +25.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+25.96% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HXGBF($26B) has a higher market cap than CODAF($1.28B). CODAF has higher P/E ratio than HXGBF: CODAF (25.56) vs HXGBF (23.04). HXGBF YTD gains are higher at: 4.629 vs. CODAF (0.000). HXGBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39B vs. CODAF (103M). HXGBF has more cash in the bank: 505M vs. CODAF (22.4M). CODAF has less debt than HXGBF: CODAF (56.1M) vs HXGBF (4.32B). HXGBF has higher revenues than CODAF: HXGBF (5.37B) vs CODAF (511M).
CODAFHXGBFCODAF / HXGBF
Capitalization1.28B26B5%
EBITDA103M1.39B7%
Gain YTD0.0004.629-
P/E Ratio25.5623.04111%
Revenue511M5.37B10%
Total Cash22.4M505M4%
Total Debt56.1M4.32B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CODAF vs HXGBF: Fundamental Ratings
CODAF
HXGBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7170
SMR RATING
1..100
5272
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4286
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CODAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBF (20). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBF’s over the last 12 months.

HXGBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (71). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBF (72). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBF’s over the last 12 months.

HXGBF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (72). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HXGBF (86). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HXGBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CODAFHXGBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HXGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYBN7.940.56
+7.59%
Cybin Inc
IMNM8.840.21
+2.43%
Immunome
BSM13.170.06
+0.46%
Black Stone Minerals LP
GURE0.69N/A
+0.10%
Gulf Resources
ALGN196.82-0.16
-0.08%
Align Technology

CODAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CODAF has been loosely correlated with HRIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CODAF jumps, then HRIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODAF
1D Price
Change %
CODAF100%
N/A
HRIBF - CODAF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HXGBY - CODAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
KYCCF - CODAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+10.84%
KRKNF - CODAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
FCUV - CODAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

HXGBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HXGBF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HXGBF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HXGBF
1D Price
Change %
HXGBF100%
-5.31%
HXGBY - HXGBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
KRKNF - HXGBF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
JELLF - HXGBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAZGF - HXGBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CODAF - HXGBF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More