Advertisement
CODAF vs FCUV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODAF is a Hold and FCUV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CODAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCUV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CODAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FCUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCUV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FCUV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CODAF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
FCUV is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+0.32% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| CODAF | FCUV | CODAF / FCUV | |
| Capitalization | 2.88B | 16.7M | 17,222% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -2.86M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -36.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 23.93 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 409K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.22M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 43.2K | - |
CODAF | FCUV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CODAF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (68). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
CODAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as FCUV (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
CODAF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (99). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
FCUV's Price Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (71). This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.
CODAF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
| CODAF | FCUV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 17% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 16% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLORX | 8.82 | 0.07 | +0.80% |
| Cohen & Steers Future of Energy R | |||
| BDSAX | 18.75 | -0.04 | -0.21% |
| BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Inv A | |||
| CMCRX | 43.70 | -0.12 | -0.27% |
| Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx R6 | |||
| RFNBX | 89.23 | -0.35 | -0.39% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs R2 | |||
| JSVZX | 24.41 | -0.20 | -0.81% |
| JPMorgan Small Cap Value R2 | |||
CODAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CODAF has been loosely correlated with HRIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CODAF jumps, then HRIBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CODAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HRIBF - CODAF | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HXGBY - CODAF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| KYCCF - CODAF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| KRKNF - CODAF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| FCUV - CODAF | 4% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||
FCUV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and MVIS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and MVIS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUV | 100% | +3.70% | ||
| MVIS - FCUV | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| WATT - FCUV | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.70% | ||
| SOTK - FCUV | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| KEYS - FCUV | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| BKSY - FCUV | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||