CODAF
Price
$7.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
FCUV
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CODAF vs FCUV

Header iconCODAF vs FCUV Comparison
Open Charts CODAF vs FCUVBanner chart's image
Codan
Price$7.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Focus Universal
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$66.69K
CapitalizationN/A
CODAF vs FCUV Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CODAF vs. FCUV commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODAF is a Hold and FCUV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CODAF: $7.30 vs. FCUV: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: CODAF and FCUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CODAF: 100% vs. FCUV: 12%
Market capitalization -- CODAF: $1.28B vs. FCUV: $27.74M
CODAF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $1.28B. FCUV’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $27.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CODAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCUV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CODAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CODAF is a better buy in the long-term than FCUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCUV’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FCUV’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CODAF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCUV is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-5.22% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CODAF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than FCUV($27.7M). CODAF YTD gains are higher at: 28.070 vs. FCUV (-83.425). CODAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. FCUV (-4.25M). CODAF has more cash in the bank: 22.4M vs. FCUV (1.45M). FCUV has less debt than CODAF: FCUV (1.21M) vs CODAF (56.1M). CODAF has higher revenues than FCUV: CODAF (511M) vs FCUV (841K).
CODAFFCUVCODAF / FCUV
Capitalization1.28B27.7M4,635%
EBITDA103M-4.25M-2,425%
Gain YTD28.070-83.425-34%
P/E Ratio25.56N/A-
Revenue511M841K60,761%
Total Cash22.4M1.45M1,547%
Total Debt56.1M1.21M4,648%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CODAF vs FCUV: Fundamental Ratings
CODAF
FCUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
5498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4962
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CODAF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (52). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (98). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FCUV (62). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CODAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CODAF has been loosely correlated with HRIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CODAF jumps, then HRIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODAF
1D Price
Change %
CODAF100%
N/A
HRIBF - CODAF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HXGBY - CODAF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
KYCCF - CODAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
KRKNF - CODAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
FCUV - CODAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
More

FCUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and KYCCF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and KYCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUV
1D Price
Change %
FCUV100%
+3.77%
KYCCF - FCUV
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
LCTC - FCUV
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDY - FCUV
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
SOTK - FCUV
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
SOBR - FCUV
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
More