CODAF
Price
$7.30
Change
-$0.56 (-7.12%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.28B
FCUV
Price
$4.24
Change
-$0.39 (-8.42%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
27.74M
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CODAF vs FCUV

Header iconCODAF vs FCUV Comparison
Open Charts CODAF vs FCUVBanner chart's image
Codan
Price$7.30
Change-$0.56 (-7.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.28B
Focus Universal
Price$4.24
Change-$0.39 (-8.42%)
Volume$12.71K
Capitalization27.74M
CODAF vs FCUV Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CODAF vs. FCUV commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODAF is a Hold and FCUV is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CODAF: $7.30 vs. FCUV: $4.71)
Brand notoriety: CODAF and FCUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CODAF: 100% vs. FCUV: 7%
Market capitalization -- CODAF: $1.28B vs. FCUV: $27.74M
CODAF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $1.28B. FCUV’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $27.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CODAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCUV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CODAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CODAF is a better buy in the long-term than FCUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCUV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FCUV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CODAF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +11.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCUV is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+11.67% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CODAF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than FCUV($27.7M). FCUV YTD gains are higher at: 21.143 vs. CODAF (0.000). CODAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. FCUV (-4.25M). CODAF has more cash in the bank: 22.4M vs. FCUV (1.45M). FCUV has less debt than CODAF: FCUV (1.21M) vs CODAF (56.1M). CODAF has higher revenues than FCUV: CODAF (511M) vs FCUV (841K).
CODAFFCUVCODAF / FCUV
Capitalization1.28B27.7M4,635%
EBITDA103M-4.25M-2,425%
Gain YTD0.00021.143-
P/E Ratio25.56N/A-
Revenue511M841K60,761%
Total Cash22.4M1.45M1,547%
Total Debt56.1M1.21M4,648%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CODAF vs FCUV: Fundamental Ratings
CODAF
FCUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
5397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CODAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (72). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as FCUV (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (97). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

FCUV's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (50). This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CODAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CODAF has been loosely correlated with HRIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CODAF jumps, then HRIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODAF
1D Price
Change %
CODAF100%
N/A
HRIBF - CODAF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HXGBY - CODAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
KYCCF - CODAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
KRKNF - CODAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.59%
FCUV - CODAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-8.42%
More

FCUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and WATT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and WATT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUV
1D Price
Change %
FCUV100%
-8.42%
WATT - FCUV
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
MVIS - FCUV
20%
Poorly correlated
-11.24%
KYCCF - FCUV
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
LCTC - FCUV
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
TDY - FCUV
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
More