COCO
Price
$36.13
Change
-$0.06 (-0.17%)
Updated
Dec 18, 11:31 AM (EDT)
78 days until earnings call
MNST
Price
$51.95
Change
-$0.30 (-0.57%)
Updated
Dec 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COCO vs MNST

Header iconCOCO vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts COCO vs MNSTBanner chart's image
Vita Coco Company (The)
Price$36.13
Change-$0.06 (-0.17%)
Volume$1.19K
CapitalizationN/A
Monster Beverage
Price$51.95
Change-$0.30 (-0.57%)
Volume$55.44K
CapitalizationN/A
COCO vs MNST Comparison Chart
Loading...
COCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COCO vs. MNST commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COCO is a Buy and MNST is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (COCO: $36.19 vs. MNST: $51.95)
Brand notoriety: COCO and MNST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COCO: 73% vs. MNST: 83%
Market capitalization -- COCO: $1.36B vs. MNST: $62.08B
COCO [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $1.36B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $62.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COCO is a better buy in the long-term than MNST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COCO is a better buy in the short-term than MNST.

Price Growth

COCO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.44% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

COCO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.87% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNST($62.1B) has a higher market cap than COCO($1.36B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than COCO: MNST (37.49) vs COCO (30.32). COCO YTD gains are higher at: 41.092 vs. MNST (-9.825). MNST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. COCO (58.6M). MNST has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. COCO (133M). COCO has less debt than MNST: COCO (1.22M) vs MNST (30.3M). MNST has higher revenues than COCO: MNST (7.14B) vs COCO (494M).
COCOMNSTCOCO / MNST
Capitalization1.36B62.1B2%
EBITDA58.6M2.02B3%
Gain YTD41.092-9.825-418%
P/E Ratio30.3237.4981%
Revenue494M7.14B7%
Total Cash133M3.25B4%
Total Debt1.22M30.3M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNST: Fundamental Ratings
MNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COCOMNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

COCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COCO and CELH have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COCO and CELH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COCO
1D Price
Change %
COCO100%
-1.66%
CELH - COCO
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.49%
PEP - COCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
MNST - COCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
KO - COCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
FIZZ - COCO
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
-0.57%
PEP - MNST
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
CELH - MNST
33%
Loosely correlated
-5.49%
CCEP - MNST
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
COCO - MNST
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
KDP - MNST
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More