It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGUROF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GUROF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
COCO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while GUROF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.53%.
COCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
COCO | GUROF | COCO / GUROF | |
Capitalization | 2.33B | 109M | 2,135% |
EBITDA | 67.1M | -2.96M | -2,263% |
Gain YTD | 10.973 | 300.000 | 4% |
P/E Ratio | 38.28 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 560M | 31.8M | 1,761% |
Total Cash | 167M | 24.2M | 690% |
Total Debt | 14M | 1.03M | 1,362% |
COCO | GUROF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago33% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago31% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago34% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago69% | about 1 month ago46% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago43% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ALVDX | 11.16 | 0.10 | +0.90% |
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val R6 | |||
NCAVX | 12.51 | 0.11 | +0.89% |
Nuance Concentrated Value Investor | |||
IPLSX | 29.37 | 0.17 | +0.58% |
Voya Index Plus LargeCap Port S | |||
VEVRX | 45.99 | 0.15 | +0.33% |
Victory Sycamore Established Value R6 | |||
LBGCX | 38.63 | -0.05 | -0.13% |
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that COCO and FIZZ have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COCO and FIZZ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COCO | 100% | -0.75% | ||
FIZZ - COCO | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
MNST - COCO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
COKE - COCO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
PEP - COCO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
CELH - COCO | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GUROF and NNFSF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GUROF and NNFSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GUROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GUROF | 100% | N/A | ||
NNFSF - GUROF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
COCSF - GUROF | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.93% | ||
YKLTF - GUROF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
COCO - GUROF | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
OTLY - GUROF | -4% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
More |