Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FTCNX
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FTCNX
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand
Price$12.41
Change-$0.15 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.11M
Fidelity Advisor Canada M
Price$76.30
Change-$1.33 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FTCNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Buy and FTCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. CNZLX (13.1M). CNZLX pays higher dividends than FTCNX: CNZLX (0.91) vs FTCNX (0.65). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FTCNX: CNZLX (34 years) vs FTCNX (19 years). CNZLX (2.86) is less costly to investors than FTCNX (1.57). CNZLX (8.00) and FTCNX (8.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FTCNX (0) vs CNZLX (200). CNZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. FTCNX (6.61). FTCNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.49 vs. CNZLX (-8.92).
| CNZLX | FTCNX | CNZLX / FTCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.57 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.57 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.885 | 17.469 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1M | 1.06B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.23 | 6.61 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.74 | 26.65 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.92 | 56.49 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.37 | 84.43 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement