Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FTCNX
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FTCNX
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand
Price$12.66
Change+$0.12 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.56M
Fidelity Advisor Canada M
Price$76.86
Change+$0.24 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FTCNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Buy and FTCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. CNZLX (13.6M). CNZLX pays higher dividends than FTCNX: CNZLX (0.95) vs FTCNX (0.64). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FTCNX: CNZLX (34 years) vs FTCNX (18 years). CNZLX (2.86) is less costly to investors than FTCNX (1.57). CNZLX (8.00) and FTCNX (8.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FTCNX (0) vs CNZLX (200). CNZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.80 vs. FTCNX (7.06). FTCNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.25 vs. CNZLX (-3.27).
| CNZLX | FTCNX | CNZLX / FTCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.57 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.57 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.693 | 17.515 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6M | 1.03B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.64 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.80 | 7.06 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.29 | 38.49 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | 61.25 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.00 | 71.82 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement