Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FTCNX
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FTCNX
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand
Price$12.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36M
Fidelity Advisor Canada M
Price$78.85
Change+$0.59 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FTCNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Buy and FTCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. CNZLX (13.4M). CNZLX pays higher dividends than FTCNX: CNZLX (0.92) vs FTCNX (0.63). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FTCNX: CNZLX (34 years) vs FTCNX (19 years). CNZLX (2.86) is less costly to investors than FTCNX (1.57). CNZLX (8.00) and FTCNX (8.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FTCNX (0) vs CNZLX (200). CNZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.69 vs. FTCNX (6.65). FTCNX return over 5 years is better than : 50.84 vs. CNZLX (-11.30).
| CNZLX | FTCNX | CNZLX / FTCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.57 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.57 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.848 | 20.031 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4M | 1.08B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.63 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 6.65 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.41 | 27.36 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.30 | 50.84 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.92 | 86.19 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement