Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FTCNX
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FTCNX
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand
Price$13.06
Change-$0.15 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.88M
Fidelity Advisor Canada M
Price$79.17
Change+$0.85 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
CNZLX vs FTCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FTCNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Hold and FTCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. CNZLX (13.9M). CNZLX pays higher dividends than FTCNX: CNZLX (0.49) vs FTCNX (0.19). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FTCNX: CNZLX (34 years) vs FTCNX (19 years). CNZLX (2.86) is less costly to investors than FTCNX (1.38). FTCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CNZLX (8.00). FTCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FTCNX (0) vs CNZLX (200). CNZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.80 vs. FTCNX (18.66). FTCNX return over 5 years is better than : 48.80 vs. CNZLX (-14.00).
| CNZLX | FTCNX | CNZLX / FTCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.38 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 1.38 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.190 | 0.503 | 1,232% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9M | 1.08B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.19 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.80 | 18.66 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.00 | 27.98 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.00 | 48.80 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.34 | 101.17 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement