It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNXC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNXC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GDS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNXC (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -7.57% price change this week, while GDS (@Information Technology Services) price change was -7.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.60%.
CNXC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
GDS is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CNXC | GDS | CNXC / GDS | |
Capitalization | 2.58B | 4.34B | 59% |
EBITDA | 1.27B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -58.643 | 143.421 | -41% |
P/E Ratio | 13.18 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 9.4B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 246M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 4.91B | N/A | - |
CNXC | GDS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNXC's Valuation (5) in the Coal industry is in the same range as GDS (27) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNXC’s stock grew similarly to GDS’s over the last 12 months.
CNXC's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Coal industry is in the same range as GDS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNXC’s stock grew similarly to GDS’s over the last 12 months.
CNXC's SMR Rating (81) in the Coal industry is in the same range as GDS (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNXC’s stock grew similarly to GDS’s over the last 12 months.
GDS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNXC (91) in the Coal industry. This means that GDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNXC’s over the last 12 months.
CNXC's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNXC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDS’s over the last 12 months.
CNXC | GDS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNXC has been loosely correlated with EXLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNXC jumps, then EXLS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNXC | 100% | -2.12% | ||
EXLS - CNXC | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
TTEC - CNXC | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
TASK - CNXC | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.22% | ||
ASGN - CNXC | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
GDYN - CNXC | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDS has been loosely correlated with VNET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDS jumps, then VNET could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GDS | 100% | -1.64% | ||
VNET - GDS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
BBAI - GDS | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
TSYHY - GDS | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.28% | ||
III - GDS | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
CNXC - GDS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
More |