Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNWDX vs RNWHX
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CNWDX vs RNWHX
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
Price$20.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets375.57M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.10
Change+$0.42 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.17B
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNWDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNWDX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. CNWDX (376M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CNWDX: RNWHX (0.91) vs CNWDX (0.00). CNWDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CNWDX (17 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CNWDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CNWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNWDX: RNWHX (250) vs CNWDX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.02 vs. CNWDX (13.50). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.77 vs. CNWDX (-1.03).
| CNWDX | RNWHX | CNWDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.72 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.460 | 25.862 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 376M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.50 | 20.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.11 | 43.48 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.03 | 18.77 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.54 | 93.48 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement