Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNWDX vs RNWHX
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CNWDX vs RNWHX
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
Price$23.74
Change+$2.62 (+12.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets429.18M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNWDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNWDX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CNWDX (429M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CNWDX: RNWHX (1.25) vs CNWDX (0.00). CNWDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CNWDX (17 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CNWDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CNWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNWDX: RNWHX (250) vs CNWDX (2500). CNWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.07 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. CNWDX (3.08).
| CNWDX | RNWHX | CNWDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.72 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.467 | 6.092 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 429M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.07 | 27.68 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.83 | 43.24 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.08 | 11.69 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.82 | 124.21 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement