Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNWDX vs RNWBX
CNWDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CNWDX vs RNWBX
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
Price$23.74
Change+$2.62 (+12.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets429.18M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CNWDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNWDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNWDX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CNWDX (429M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than CNWDX: RNWBX (0.45) vs CNWDX (0.00). CNWDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CNWDX (17 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). CNWDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). CNWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNWDX: RNWBX (250) vs CNWDX (2500). CNWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.07 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. CNWDX (3.08).
| CNWDX | RNWBX | CNWDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.66 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.66 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.467 | 5.996 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 429M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.07 | 26.27 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.83 | 38.81 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.08 | 7.03 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.82 | 114.19 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement