It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBTC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNTY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBTC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNTY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -8.67% price change this week, while TBTC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +10.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.54%.
CNTY is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| CNTY | TBTC | CNTY / TBTC | |
| Capitalization | 47.4M | 21.8M | 217% |
| EBITDA | 65.6M | 1.8M | 3,655% |
| Gain YTD | -51.235 | 28.799 | -178% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.06 | - |
| Revenue | 575M | 11.6M | 4,957% |
| Total Cash | 85.5M | 8.04M | 1,063% |
| Total Debt | 1.08B | 468K | 230,769% |
CNTY | TBTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TBTC's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNTY (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
TBTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNTY (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
TBTC's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNTY (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
TBTC's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CNTY (90) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
CNTY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as TBTC (36) in the null industry. This means that CNTY’s stock grew similarly to TBTC’s over the last 12 months.
| CNTY | TBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 29 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 3 days ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNTY and VAC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNTY and VAC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTY | 100% | -7.60% | ||
| VAC - CNTY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
| INSE - CNTY | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.78% | ||
| GDEN - CNTY | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| BRSL - CNTY | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FLL - CNTY | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.41% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that TBTC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBTC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBTC | 100% | +8.05% | ||
| CNTY - TBTC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| BTSBF - TBTC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SJMHY - TBTC | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WYNMF - TBTC | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| SCHYF - TBTC | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||