Advertisement
CNTY vs MTN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNTY is a Hold and MTN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNTY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNTY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CNTY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -1.95% price change this week, while MTN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +3.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNTY is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.
MTN is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.92% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| CNTY | MTN | CNTY / MTN | |
| Capitalization | 44.8M | 5.01B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 64.6M | 864M | 7% |
| Gain YTD | 13.534 | 5.384 | 251% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 20.14 | - |
| Revenue | 573M | 2.98B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 77.7M | 581M | 13% |
| Total Debt | 1.08B | 3.42B | 32% |
CNTY | MTN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNTY's Valuation (45) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTN (89) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CNTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTN’s over the last 12 months.
CNTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MTN (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CNTY’s stock grew similarly to MTN’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's SMR Rating (14) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNTY (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew significantly faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CNTY (81) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
CNTY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTN (81) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CNTY’s stock grew significantly faster than MTN’s over the last 12 months.
| CNTY | MTN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
CNTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNTY has been loosely correlated with PENN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNTY jumps, then PENN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTY | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| PENN - CNTY | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| MLCO - CNTY | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| VAC - CNTY | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| MTN - CNTY | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| CZR - CNTY | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.39% | ||
More | ||||
MTN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTN has been loosely correlated with VAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTN jumps, then VAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| VAC - MTN | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| PENN - MTN | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| CZR - MTN | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.39% | ||
| MLCO - MTN | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| BYD - MTN | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||