Advertisement
CNTY vs MSC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNTY is a Hold and MSC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MSC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CNTY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -7.08% price change this week, while MSC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNTY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
MSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.14% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| CNTY | MSC | CNTY / MSC | |
| Capitalization | 66.9M | 867M | 8% |
| EBITDA | 65.6M | 273M | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -31.173 | -20.354 | 153% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 575M | 679M | 85% |
| Total Cash | 85.5M | 173M | 49% |
| Total Debt | 1.08B | 2.18B | 50% |
CNTY | MSC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 25 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSC's Valuation (48) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CNTY (67). This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
MSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CNTY (100). This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
MSC's SMR Rating (95) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CNTY (100). This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
MSC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CNTY (57). This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
CNTY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (100). This means that CNTY’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
| CNTY | MSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
Advertisement
CNTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNTY and INSE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNTY and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTY | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| INSE - CNTY | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| VAC - CNTY | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| GDEN - CNTY | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| BRSL - CNTY | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| FLL - CNTY | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||
MSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC | 100% | +4.17% | ||
| CNTY - MSC | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| SCHYF - MSC | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CZR - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| WYNN - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
| FLL - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||