CNTY
Price
$1.70
Change
+$0.04 (+2.41%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
48.88M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLL
Price
$2.55
Change
+$0.03 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.03M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNTY vs FLL

Header iconCNTY vs FLL Comparison
Open Charts CNTY vs FLLBanner chart's image
Century Casinos
Price$1.70
Change+$0.04 (+2.41%)
Volume$605
Capitalization48.88M
Full House Resorts
Price$2.55
Change+$0.03 (+1.19%)
Volume$200
Capitalization91.03M
CNTY vs FLL Comparison Chart in %
CNTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNTY vs. FLL commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNTY is a Hold and FLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CNTY: $1.66 vs. FLL: $2.52)
Brand notoriety: CNTY and FLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNTY: 63% vs. FLL: 61%
Market capitalization -- CNTY: $48.88M vs. FLL: $91.03M
CNTY [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $48.88M. FLL’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $91.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $40.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNTY is a better buy in the long-term than FLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNTY is a better buy in the short-term than FLL.

Price Growth

CNTY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +5.06% price change this week, while FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNTY is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.43% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLL($91M) has a higher market cap than CNTY($48.9M). CNTY YTD gains are higher at: 24.812 vs. FLL (-3.448). CNTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.6M vs. FLL (42.4M). CNTY has more cash in the bank: 77.7M vs. FLL (30.9M). FLL has less debt than CNTY: FLL (532M) vs CNTY (1.08B). CNTY has higher revenues than FLL: CNTY (573M) vs FLL (300M).
CNTYFLLCNTY / FLL
Capitalization48.9M91M54%
EBITDA64.6M42.4M152%
Gain YTD24.812-3.448-720%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue573M300M191%
Total Cash77.7M30.9M251%
Total Debt1.08B532M203%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNTY vs FLL: Fundamental Ratings
CNTY
FLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6387
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNTY's Valuation (61) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (72). This means that CNTY’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CNTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (100). This means that CNTY’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's SMR Rating (99) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CNTY (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.

CNTY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (87). This means that CNTY’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CNTY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (9). This means that CNTY’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNTYFLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBGRY16.940.50
+3.07%
NATIONAL BK GREECE S A
REEMF0.850.02
+2.15%
Rare Element Resources Ltd.
EXCH69.90N/A
N/A
Exchange Bankshares, Inc.
EXOSF51.55N/A
N/A
EXOSENS SA
AISSF0.03-0.01
-31.07%
AIS Res Ltd.

CNTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNTY and INSE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNTY and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNTY
1D Price
Change %
CNTY100%
+1.22%
INSE - CNTY
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
VAC - CNTY
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
GDEN - CNTY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
BRSL - CNTY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
FLL - CNTY
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
More

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with GDEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then GDEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
+2.86%
GDEN - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
CZR - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
INSE - FLL
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
PENN - FLL
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYD - FLL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More