Advertisement
CNTMF vs GTBIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNTMF is a Hold and GTBIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNTMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNTMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GTBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNTMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTBIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNTMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GTBIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CNTMF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -7.84% price change this week, while GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -11.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.99%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.16% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| CNTMF | GTBIF | CNTMF / GTBIF | |
| Capitalization | 28.2M | 1.69B | 2% |
| EBITDA | -11.31M | 338M | -3% |
| Gain YTD | -35.395 | -11.016 | 321% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 66.09 | - |
| Revenue | 105M | 1.15B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 18.4M | 177M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 156M | 523M | 30% |
CNTMF | GTBIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNTMF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (85). This means that CNTMF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.
CNTMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (100). This means that CNTMF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.
GTBIF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CNTMF (99). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CNTMF’s over the last 12 months.
GTBIF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CNTMF (65). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CNTMF’s over the last 12 months.
GTBIF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNTMF (97). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CNTMF’s over the last 12 months.
| CNTMF | GTBIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
CNTMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNTMF has been loosely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNTMF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNTMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTMF | 100% | -6.00% | ||
| TCNNF - CNTMF | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| VRNOF - CNTMF | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| GTBIF - CNTMF | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| CURLF - CNTMF | 36% Loosely correlated | -7.35% | ||
| CRLBF - CNTMF | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||
GTBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with CURLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then CURLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTBIF | 100% | -2.02% | ||
| CURLF - GTBIF | 82% Closely correlated | -7.35% | ||
| TCNNF - GTBIF | 82% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| VRNOF - GTBIF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| TSNDF - GTBIF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| CRLBF - GTBIF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||