CNSWF
Price
$3330.04
Change
-$2.21 (-0.07%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
70.57B
62 days until earnings call
SPNS
Price
$42.94
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.4B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNSWF vs SPNS

Header iconCNSWF vs SPNS Comparison
Open Charts CNSWF vs SPNSBanner chart's image
Constellation Software
Price$3330.04
Change-$2.21 (-0.07%)
Volume$2.12K
Capitalization70.57B
Sapiens International
Price$42.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$12.16K
Capitalization2.4B
CNSWF vs SPNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNSWF vs. SPNS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSWF is a StrongBuy and SPNS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CNSWF: $3330.04 vs. SPNS: $42.93)
Brand notoriety: CNSWF and SPNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNSWF: 130% vs. SPNS: 67%
Market capitalization -- CNSWF: $70.57B vs. SPNS: $2.4B
CNSWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $70.57B. SPNS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPNS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPNS is a better buy in the long-term than CNSWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNSWF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SPNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNSWF is a better buy in the short-term than SPNS.

Price Growth

CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.58% price change this week, while SPNS (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

SPNS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNSWF($70.6B) has a higher market cap than SPNS($2.4B). CNSWF has higher P/E ratio than SPNS: CNSWF (110.12) vs SPNS (35.19). SPNS YTD gains are higher at: 63.989 vs. CNSWF (7.518). CNSWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.62B vs. SPNS (102M). CNSWF has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. SPNS (74.5M). SPNS has less debt than CNSWF: SPNS (45.4M) vs CNSWF (5.16B). CNSWF has higher revenues than SPNS: CNSWF (10.7B) vs SPNS (549M).
CNSWFSPNSCNSWF / SPNS
Capitalization70.6B2.4B2,942%
EBITDA2.62B102M2,566%
Gain YTD7.51863.98912%
P/E Ratio110.1235.19313%
Revenue10.7B549M1,949%
Total Cash2.58B74.5M3,459%
Total Debt5.16B45.4M11,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNSWF vs SPNS: Fundamental Ratings
CNSWF
SPNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
530
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
751
SMR RATING
1..100
4256
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPNS's Valuation (16) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNSWF (80) in the null industry. This means that SPNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPNS (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SPNS (56) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to SPNS’s over the last 12 months.

SPNS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (61) in the null industry. This means that SPNS’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

SPNS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (38) in the null industry. This means that SPNS’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSWFSPNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGXRX17.070.14
+0.83%
Hartford Global Impact R3
SREYX16.290.10
+0.62%
SEI Real Estate Y (SIMT)
FANAX46.83N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Energy A
FSAGX46.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Gold
FGLGX25.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock

CNSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSWF
1D Price
Change %
CNSWF100%
-0.07%
MSFT - CNSWF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
ROP - CNSWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
OTEX - CNSWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
SPNS - CNSWF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BSY - CNSWF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More

SPNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPNS has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPNS jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPNS
1D Price
Change %
SPNS100%
-0.16%
MSFT - SPNS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
INTA - SPNS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
CNSWF - SPNS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
PGY - SPNS
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.36%
ACIW - SPNS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More