CNSWF
Price
$3412.00
Change
-$18.11 (-0.53%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
44.8B
13 days until earnings call
ROP
Price
$574.05
Change
-$7.37 (-1.27%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
59.25B
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNSWF vs ROP

Header iconCNSWF vs ROP Comparison
Open Charts CNSWF vs ROPBanner chart's image
Constellation Software
Price$3412.00
Change-$18.11 (-0.53%)
Volume$983
Capitalization44.8B
Roper Technologies
Price$574.05
Change-$7.37 (-1.27%)
Volume$634.31K
Capitalization59.25B
CNSWF vs ROP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNSWF vs. ROP commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSWF is a Buy and ROP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CNSWF: $3488.52 vs. ROP: $572.53)
Brand notoriety: CNSWF and ROP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNSWF: 64% vs. ROP: 83%
Market capitalization -- CNSWF: $44.8B vs. ROP: $59.25B
CNSWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $44.8B. ROP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $59.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ROP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNSWF is a better buy in the long-term than ROP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNSWF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ROP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNSWF is a better buy in the short-term than ROP.

Price Growth

CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while ROP (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNSWF is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

ROP is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.10% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ROP($59.2B) has a higher market cap than CNSWF($44.8B). CNSWF has higher P/E ratio than ROP: CNSWF (86.96) vs ROP (43.46). CNSWF YTD gains are higher at: 12.569 vs. ROP (10.311). ROP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.66B vs. CNSWF (1.51B). CNSWF has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. ROP (214M). CNSWF has less debt than ROP: CNSWF (2.38B) vs ROP (6.37B). CNSWF has higher revenues than ROP: CNSWF (7.11B) vs ROP (6.18B).
CNSWFROPCNSWF / ROP
Capitalization44.8B59.2B76%
EBITDA1.51B2.66B57%
Gain YTD12.56910.311122%
P/E Ratio86.9643.46200%
Revenue7.11B6.18B115%
Total Cash1.01B214M472%
Total Debt2.38B6.37B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNSWF vs ROP: Fundamental Ratings
CNSWF
ROP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
321
SMR RATING
1..100
3677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4064
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ROP's Valuation (69) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CNSWF (85) in the null industry. This means that ROP’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ROP (21) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to ROP’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROP (77) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.

ROP's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CNSWF (43) in the null industry. This means that ROP’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ROP (64) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to ROP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSWFROP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

CNSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSWF
1D Price
Change %
CNSWF100%
-0.04%
MSFT - CNSWF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
ROP - CNSWF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
OTEX - CNSWF
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
SPNS - CNSWF
38%
Loosely correlated
+4.66%
BSY - CNSWF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More

ROP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROP has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROP jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROP
1D Price
Change %
ROP100%
-0.18%
INTU - ROP
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
SSNC - ROP
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
DOX - ROP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
CNSWF - ROP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
SNPS - ROP
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More