CNSWF
Price
$3345.37
Change
-$46.29 (-1.36%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
70.89B
87 days until earnings call
ROP
Price
$527.41
Change
-$6.97 (-1.30%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.51B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNSWF vs ROP

Header iconCNSWF vs ROP Comparison
Open Charts CNSWF vs ROPBanner chart's image
Constellation Software
Price$3345.37
Change-$46.29 (-1.36%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization70.89B
Roper Technologies
Price$527.41
Change-$6.97 (-1.30%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization57.51B
CNSWF vs ROP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNSWF vs. ROP commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSWF is a Hold and ROP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CNSWF: $3345.37 vs. ROP: $534.38)
Brand notoriety: CNSWF and ROP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNSWF: 133% vs. ROP: 68%
Market capitalization -- CNSWF: $70.89B vs. ROP: $57.51B
CNSWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $70.89B. ROP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $57.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ROP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNSWF is a better buy in the long-term than ROP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNSWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ROP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ROP is a better buy in the short-term than CNSWF.

Price Growth

CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.75% price change this week, while ROP (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

ROP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNSWF($70.9B) has a higher market cap than ROP($57.5B). CNSWF has higher P/E ratio than ROP: CNSWF (110.63) vs ROP (37.53). CNSWF YTD gains are higher at: 8.013 vs. ROP (3.258). CNSWF has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. ROP (242M). CNSWF has less debt than ROP: CNSWF (4.72B) vs ROP (8.86B).
CNSWFROPCNSWF / ROP
Capitalization70.9B57.5B123%
EBITDAN/A3.1B-
Gain YTD8.0133.258246%
P/E Ratio110.6337.53295%
RevenueN/A7.47B-
Total Cash2.48B242M1,024%
Total Debt4.72B8.86B53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNSWF vs ROP: Fundamental Ratings
CNSWF
ROP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
440
SMR RATING
1..100
3576
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4856
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ROP's Valuation (23) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNSWF (86) in the null industry. This means that ROP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROP (40) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROP (76) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.

ROP's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CNSWF (61) in the null industry. This means that ROP’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as ROP (56) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to ROP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSWFROP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CASI1.630.16
+10.88%
CASI Pharmaceuticals
KGEI6.06N/A
N/A
Kolibri Global Energy
KRG20.94-0.51
-2.38%
Kite Realty Group Trust
THS18.63-0.50
-2.61%
Treehouse Foods
SNOW191.73-14.67
-7.11%
Snowflake

CNSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSWF
1D Price
Change %
CNSWF100%
-1.36%
MSFT - CNSWF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
ROP - CNSWF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
OTEX - CNSWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+9.84%
SPNS - CNSWF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
BSY - CNSWF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More

ROP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROP has been closely correlated with ADP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROP jumps, then ADP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROP
1D Price
Change %
ROP100%
-0.43%
ADP - ROP
67%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
DOX - ROP
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
SSNC - ROP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
ADSK - ROP
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
CPAY - ROP
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More