It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOTEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OTEX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while OTEX (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
OTEX is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CNSWF | OTEX | CNSWF / OTEX | |
Capitalization | 44.8B | 10.3B | 435% |
EBITDA | 1.51B | 1.56B | 97% |
Gain YTD | 30.004 | -25.717 | -117% |
P/E Ratio | 86.96 | 80.04 | 109% |
Revenue | 7.11B | 5.7B | 125% |
Total Cash | 1.01B | 1B | 101% |
Total Debt | 2.38B | 8.84B | 27% |
CNSWF | OTEX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OTEX's Valuation (6) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNSWF (84) in the null industry. This means that OTEX’s stock grew significantly faster than CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OTEX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew significantly faster than OTEX’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTEX (66) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTEX’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OTEX (75) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to OTEX’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as OTEX (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to OTEX’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF | OTEX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 3 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 3 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 3 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 3 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 3 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 3 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 3 days ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF | 100% | -1.32% | ||
MSFT - CNSWF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
ROP - CNSWF | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
OTEX - CNSWF | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.08% | ||
SPNS - CNSWF | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
BSY - CNSWF | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OTEX has been closely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OTEX jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OTEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OTEX | 100% | +1.33% | ||
SPT - OTEX | 72% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
NET - OTEX | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.57% | ||
BRZE - OTEX | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
STEM - OTEX | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
PCOR - OTEX | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.42% | ||
More |