It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSFT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while MSFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
MSFT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CNSWF | MSFT | CNSWF / MSFT | |
Capitalization | 44.8B | 3.16T | 1% |
EBITDA | 1.51B | 121B | 1% |
Gain YTD | 30.004 | 14.143 | 212% |
P/E Ratio | 86.96 | 38.39 | 227% |
Revenue | 7.11B | 228B | 3% |
Total Cash | 1.01B | 81B | 1% |
Total Debt | 2.38B | 88.4B | 3% |
CNSWF | MSFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSFT's Valuation (66) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (84) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MSFT (10) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's SMR Rating (27) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (28) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (45) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (73) in the null industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF | MSFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago46% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 1 day ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago47% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF | 100% | -1.32% | ||
MSFT - CNSWF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
ROP - CNSWF | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
OTEX - CNSWF | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.08% | ||
SPNS - CNSWF | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
BSY - CNSWF | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSFT has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSFT jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 100% | +0.40% | ||
DSGX - MSFT | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
INTU - MSFT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
ADBE - MSFT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
ORCL - MSFT | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
SAP - MSFT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More |