CNS
Price
$66.41
Change
+$0.04 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.39B
18 days until earnings call
VRTS
Price
$192.24
Change
+$2.31 (+1.22%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNS vs VRTS

Header iconCNS vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs VRTSBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$66.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
Volume$216.66K
Capitalization3.39B
Virtus Investment Partners
Price$192.24
Change+$2.31 (+1.22%)
Volume$139.99K
Capitalization1.3B
CNS vs VRTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. VRTS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a Buy and VRTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CNS: $66.41 vs. VRTS: $192.24)
Brand notoriety: CNS and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 88% vs. VRTS: 180%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.39B vs. VRTS: $1.3B
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.39B. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than VRTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the short-term than VRTS.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.18% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.39B) has a higher market cap than VRTS($1.3B). CNS has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: CNS (21.08) vs VRTS (9.38). VRTS YTD gains are higher at: -9.585 vs. CNS (-26.381). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 451M vs. CNS (216M). VRTS has more cash in the bank: 243M vs. CNS (230M). CNS has less debt than VRTS: CNS (142M) vs VRTS (2.35B). VRTS has higher revenues than CNS: VRTS (885M) vs CNS (566M).
CNSVRTSCNS / VRTS
Capitalization3.39B1.3B261%
EBITDA216M451M48%
Gain YTD-26.381-9.585275%
P/E Ratio21.089.38225%
Revenue566M885M64%
Total Cash230M243M95%
Total Debt142M2.35B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7168
SMR RATING
1..100
2952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9184
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRTS's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (20). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (71). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VRTS (52). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (86). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (91). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRHBX26.210.25
+0.96%
Nuveen Small Cap Blend Idx I
HWMIX58.030.54
+0.94%
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value I
BLUEX39.850.18
+0.45%
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
PAGLX47.140.05
+0.11%
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Adv
VWIGX38.38-0.03
-0.08%
Vanguard International Growth Inv

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+0.06%
APAM - CNS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BX - CNS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
TROW - CNS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
VRTS - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
BEN - CNS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
+1.22%
APAM - VRTS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
JHG - VRTS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
TROW - VRTS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
DHIL - VRTS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
BX - VRTS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
More