CNS
Price
$75.19
Change
-$1.09 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
80 days until earnings call
SAMG
Price
$16.41
Change
-$0.13 (-0.79%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
143.23M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNS vs SAMG

Header iconCNS vs SAMG Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs SAMGBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$75.19
Change-$1.09 (-1.43%)
Volume$169.09K
Capitalization3.7B
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
Price$16.41
Change-$0.13 (-0.79%)
Volume$14.71K
Capitalization143.23M
CNS vs SAMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. SAMG commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a StrongBuy and SAMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CNS: $75.19 vs. SAMG: $16.41)
Brand notoriety: CNS and SAMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 80% vs. SAMG: 26%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.7B vs. SAMG: $143.23M
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.7B. SAMG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $143.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAMG is a better buy in the long-term than CNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAMG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the short-term than SAMG.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while SAMG (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

SAMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.7B) has a higher market cap than SAMG($143M). CNS has higher P/E ratio than SAMG: CNS (28.73) vs SAMG (15.74). SAMG YTD gains are higher at: -8.482 vs. CNS (-17.353). CNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 184M vs. SAMG (23.9M). CNS has more cash in the bank: 265M vs. SAMG (70.3M). SAMG has less debt than CNS: SAMG (29.3M) vs CNS (140M). CNS has higher revenues than SAMG: CNS (490M) vs SAMG (117M).
CNSSAMGCNS / SAMG
Capitalization3.7B143M2,587%
EBITDA184M23.9M770%
Gain YTD-17.353-8.482205%
P/E Ratio28.7315.74183%
Revenue490M117M419%
Total Cash265M70.3M377%
Total Debt140M29.3M478%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs SAMG: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
SAMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2339
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6545
SMR RATING
1..100
2765
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8658
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAMG's Valuation (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CNS (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAMG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

SAMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CNS (65) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAMG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAMG (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAMG’s over the last 12 months.

SAMG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CNS (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAMG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

SAMG's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CNS (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAMG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSSAMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AASCX31.570.21
+0.67%
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock A
NVSOX13.850.08
+0.58%
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Adm
IYSYX18.830.09
+0.48%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class Y
BSPPX746.632.99
+0.40%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor P
EIIFX12.560.04
+0.32%
Eaton Vance Balanced I

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
-1.43%
APAM - CNS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
BX - CNS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
TROW - CNS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
BN - CNS
66%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
HLNE - CNS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

SAMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMG has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAMG jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAMG
1D Price
Change %
SAMG100%
-0.79%
APAM - SAMG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CNS - SAMG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
BN - SAMG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
STT - SAMG
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
VRTS - SAMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-7.47%
More