CNS
Price
$72.54
Change
-$0.14 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
39 days until earnings call
NTRSO
Price
$20.61
Change
+$0.22 (+1.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNS vs NTRSO

Header iconCNS vs NTRSO Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs NTRSOBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$72.54
Change-$0.14 (-0.19%)
Volume$143.15K
Capitalization3.7B
Northern Trust
Price$20.61
Change+$0.22 (+1.08%)
Volume$22.99K
CapitalizationN/A
CNS vs NTRSO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTRSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. NTRSO commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a Hold and NTRSO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CNS: $72.54 vs. NTRSO: $20.61)
Brand notoriety: CNS and NTRSO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 61% vs. NTRSO: 85%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.7B vs. NTRSO: $0
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.7B. NTRSO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRSO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NTRSO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than NTRSO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRSO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NTRSO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTRSO is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while NTRSO (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTRSO YTD gains are higher at: 5.549 vs. CNS (-19.585). NTRSO has more cash in the bank: 4.37B vs. CNS (187M). CNS has less debt than NTRSO: CNS (142M) vs NTRSO (13.5B).
CNSNTRSOCNS / NTRSO
Capitalization3.7BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.5855.549-353%
P/E Ratio23.03N/A-
RevenueN/A7.87B-
Total Cash187M4.37B4%
Total Debt142M13.5B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs NTRSO: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
NTRSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
29100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTRSO's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CNS (22) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NTRSO’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRSO (100) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRSO’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTRSO (100) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew significantly faster than NTRSO’s over the last 12 months.

NTRSO's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CNS (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NTRSO’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as NTRSO (100) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to NTRSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSNTRSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTRSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBXG2.810.03
+0.91%
U-BX Technology Ltd
SVCCU10.31N/A
N/A
Stellar V Capital Corp
NMAX13.31-0.01
-0.08%
Newsmax Inc
VSTA4.54-0.06
-1.30%
Vasta Platform Limited
LEVI22.22-0.33
-1.46%
Levi Strauss & Co

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
-0.19%
APAM - CNS
75%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
BX - CNS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
VRTS - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
TROW - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
BN - CNS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

NTRSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTRSO has been loosely correlated with BPYPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTRSO jumps, then BPYPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTRSO
1D Price
Change %
NTRSO100%
+1.08%
BPYPM - NTRSO
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
BLK - NTRSO
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
CNS - NTRSO
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BN - NTRSO
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
BX - NTRSO
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More