CNS
Price
$92.49
Change
+$1.82 (+2.01%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
30 days until earnings call
JHG
Price
$42.55
Change
+$0.85 (+2.04%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNS vs JHG

Header iconCNS vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs JHGBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$92.49
Change+$1.82 (+2.01%)
Volume$704.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Janus Henderson Group
Price$42.55
Change+$0.85 (+2.04%)
Volume$3.18M
CapitalizationN/A
CNS vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. JHG commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a Hold and JHG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CNS: $92.49 vs. JHG: $42.55)
Brand notoriety: CNS and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 305% vs. JHG: 298%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.7B vs. JHG: $5.22B
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.7B. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than JHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JHG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JHG is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.61% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

JHG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHG($5.22B) has a higher market cap than CNS($3.7B). CNS has higher P/E ratio than JHG: CNS (28.73) vs JHG (13.66). JHG YTD gains are higher at: 47.611 vs. CNS (25.732). JHG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 563M vs. CNS (184M). JHG has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than JHG: CNS (140M) vs JHG (382M). JHG has higher revenues than CNS: JHG (2.1B) vs CNS (490M).
CNSJHGCNS / JHG
Capitalization3.7B5.22B71%
EBITDA184M563M33%
Gain YTD25.73247.61154%
P/E Ratio28.7313.66210%
Revenue490M2.1B23%
Total Cash265M1.89B14%
Total Debt140M382M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs JHG: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7387
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3732
SMR RATING
1..100
2774
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JHG's Valuation (74) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (92). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (37). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHG (74). This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHG’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (48). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (28). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSJHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+2.01%
APAM - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
BX - CNS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BN - CNS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
VRTS - CNS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
JHG - CNS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
More

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
+2.04%
APAM - JHG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
TROW - JHG
70%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
BN - JHG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
IVZ - JHG
66%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
CG - JHG
66%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
More