Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRWX vs GFACX
CNRWX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CNRWX vs GFACX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
Price$2.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CNRWX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNRWX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNRWX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CNRWX (146M). CNRWX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CNRWX (0.04) vs GFACX (0.00). CNRWX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CNRWX (13 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CNRWX (1.07). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CNRWX (5.00). CNRWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CNRWX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. CNRWX (-89.04). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. CNRWX (-87.69).
| CNRWX | GFACX | CNRWX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -88.757 | 6.760 | -1,313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -89.04 | 3.61 | -2,468% |
| Returns for 3 years | -87.49 | 57.24 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | -87.69 | 12.81 | -685% |
| Returns for 10 years | -79.42 | 72.42 | -110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement