Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRWX vs FFAFX
CNRWX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CNRWX vs FFAFX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
Price$2.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.04M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CNRWX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CNRWX (160M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than CNRWX: FFAFX (0.54) vs CNRWX (0.04). CNRWX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: CNRWX (13 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). CNRWX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CNRWX (20.00). CNRWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: CNRWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. CNRWX (-90.70). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. CNRWX (-87.52).
| CNRWX | FFAFX | CNRWX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.35 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.35 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -88.677 | 19.205 | -462% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.54 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -90.70 | 7.34 | -1,236% |
| Returns for 3 years | -88.29 | 63.71 | -139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -87.52 | 34.69 | -252% |
| Returns for 10 years | -79.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers