Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRUX vs GFACX
CNRUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CNRUX vs GFACX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Instl
Price$3.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CNRUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNRUX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNRUX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CNRUX (146M). CNRUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CNRUX (0.34) vs GFACX (0.00). CNRUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CNRUX (13 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CNRUX (0.57). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CNRUX (5.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNRUX: GFACX (250) vs CNRUX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. CNRUX (-87.39). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.83 vs. CNRUX (-85.56).
| CNRUX | GFACX | CNRUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.35 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.35 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -87.058 | 6.775 | -1,285% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -87.39 | 3.47 | -2,522% |
| Returns for 3 years | -85.44 | 56.11 | -152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -85.56 | 12.83 | -667% |
| Returns for 10 years | -75.03 | 74.12 | -101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement