It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LII’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LII’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LII (@Building Products) experienced а -2.58% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.
LII is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
CNR | LII | CNR / LII | |
Capitalization | 3.14B | 17.4B | 18% |
EBITDA | 1.51B | 880M | 172% |
Gain YTD | -30.629 | -11.497 | 266% |
P/E Ratio | 4.12 | 29.27 | 14% |
Revenue | 5.88B | 4.98B | 118% |
Total Cash | 544M | 69.1M | 787% |
Total Debt | 3.33B | 1.53B | 218% |
CNR | LII | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNR's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as LII (88) in the Building Products industry. This means that CNR’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.
LII's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CNR (42) in the null industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to CNR’s over the last 12 months.
LII's SMR Rating (12) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNR (84) in the null industry. This means that LII’s stock grew significantly faster than CNR’s over the last 12 months.
CNR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as LII (63) in the Building Products industry. This means that CNR’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.
CNR's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LII (79) in the Building Products industry. This means that CNR’s stock grew significantly faster than LII’s over the last 12 months.
CNR | LII | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago84% | about 1 month ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago75% | 3 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago67% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SETH | 15.50 | 0.90 | +6.16% |
ProShares Short Ether ETF | |||
AGZD | 22.33 | N/A | N/A |
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF | |||
MMD | 14.61 | -0.09 | -0.61% |
NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund | |||
URTH | 165.00 | -1.97 | -1.18% |
iShares MSCI World ETF | |||
FYX | 93.66 | -1.92 | -2.01% |
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNR and JCI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNR and JCI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNR | 100% | +3.77% | ||
JCI - CNR | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
OC - CNR | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
CARR - CNR | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
SPXC - CNR | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
LII - CNR | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LII has been closely correlated with CARR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LII jumps, then CARR could also see price increases.