Advertisement
CNR vs COAL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNR is a Hold and COAL is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CNR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
CNR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CNR | COAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
CNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNR and JCI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNR and JCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNR | 100% | +3.77% | ||
| JCI - CNR | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| OC - CNR | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
| CARR - CNR | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| SPXC - CNR | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
| LII - CNR | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||
COAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COAL has been closely correlated with AMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COAL jumps, then AMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COAL | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| AMR - COAL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| HCC - COAL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| BTU - COAL | 73% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| CNR - COAL | 69% Closely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| BHP - COAL | 67% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
More | ||||