CNQ
Price
$38.53
Change
+$1.05 (+2.80%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
80.4B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDS
Price
$18.21
Change
+$0.41 (+2.30%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
34.49B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNQ vs WDS

Header iconCNQ vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs WDSBanner chart's image
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$38.53
Change+$1.05 (+2.80%)
Volume$13.01M
Capitalization80.4B
Woodside Energy Group
Price$18.21
Change+$0.41 (+2.30%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization34.49B
CNQ vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. WDS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a Buy and WDS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CNQ: $38.53 vs. WDS: $18.21)
Brand notoriety: CNQ: Notable vs. WDS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 148% vs. WDS: 151%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $80.4B vs. WDS: $34.49B
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $80.4B. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $34.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $132.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than WDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the short-term than CNQ.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +3.85% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

WDS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.42% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($80.4B) has a higher market cap than WDS($34.5B). CNQ has higher P/E ratio than WDS: CNQ (16.58) vs WDS (11.80). WDS YTD gains are higher at: 16.806 vs. CNQ (13.826). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5B vs. WDS (9.55B). WDS has more cash in the bank: 5.15B vs. CNQ (113M). WDS has less debt than CNQ: WDS (13.6B) vs CNQ (17.3B). CNQ has higher revenues than WDS: CNQ (44.5B) vs WDS (13.8B).
CNQWDSCNQ / WDS
Capitalization80.4B34.5B233%
EBITDA17.5B9.55B183%
Gain YTD13.82616.80682%
P/E Ratio16.5811.80140%
Revenue44.5B13.8B322%
Total Cash113M5.15B2%
Total Debt17.3B13.6B127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3470
SMR RATING
1..100
5194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (77) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (70) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (94) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (48) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (79) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDOG41.730.72
+1.76%
ALPS International Sector Div Dogs ETF
UPGD78.771.35
+1.74%
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Imp ETF
BDVG13.550.13
+0.95%
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
FSEC44.08-0.13
-0.29%
Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF
GGTL31.52-1.02
-3.12%
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
+2.80%
BTE - CNQ
82%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
VET - CNQ
81%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
PR - CNQ
81%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
MGY - CNQ
81%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
DVN - CNQ
80%
Closely correlated
+5.55%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been closely correlated with SD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then SD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
+2.30%
SD - WDS
71%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
VET - WDS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
CNQ - WDS
68%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
DVN - WDS
66%
Loosely correlated
+5.55%
COP - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.55%
More