CNQ
Price
$30.02
Change
-$0.30 (-0.99%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
63.19B
80 days until earnings call
FANG
Price
$137.51
Change
-$4.52 (-3.18%)
Updated
Aug 11, 01:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.12B
91 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNQ vs FANG

Header iconCNQ vs FANG Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs FANGBanner chart's image
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$30.02
Change-$0.30 (-0.99%)
Volume$1.84K
Capitalization63.19B
Diamondback Energy
Price$137.51
Change-$4.52 (-3.18%)
Volume$13.73K
Capitalization41.12B
CNQ vs FANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. FANG commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a Buy and FANG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CNQ: $30.31 vs. FANG: $142.03)
Brand notoriety: CNQ and FANG are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 120% vs. FANG: 73%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $63.19B vs. FANG: $41.12B
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $63.19B. FANG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $41.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $117.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than CNQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.13% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.36% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($63.2B) has a higher market cap than FANG($41.1B). CNQ (10.57) and FANG (10.29) have similar P/E ratio . CNQ YTD gains are higher at: -1.814 vs. FANG (-12.088). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.6B vs. FANG (9.12B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 1.82B vs. CNQ (93M). FANG has less debt than CNQ: FANG (13.9B) vs CNQ (17.4B). CNQ has higher revenues than FANG: CNQ (44.8B) vs FANG (12.8B).
CNQFANGCNQ / FANG
Capitalization63.2B41.1B154%
EBITDA17.6B9.12B193%
Gain YTD-1.814-12.08815%
P/E Ratio10.5710.29103%
Revenue44.8B12.8B350%
Total Cash93M1.82B5%
Total Debt17.4B13.9B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs FANG: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3335
SMR RATING
1..100
4756
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7850
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNQ's Valuation (28) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (50). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (35). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (56). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (74). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (78). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQFANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONX61.451.66
+2.78%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF
THLV29.020.11
+0.38%
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
POCT42.120.15
+0.36%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buf ETF™ Oct
BSMT22.89N/A
+0.01%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF
VOT284.47-3.44
-1.19%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
-0.39%
BTE - CNQ
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
VET - CNQ
82%
Closely correlated
-4.09%
FANG - CNQ
80%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
OVV - CNQ
79%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
PR - CNQ
79%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
More

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with DVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then DVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
+0.64%
DVN - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
MTDR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
PR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
OVV - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
COP - FANG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
More