CNQ
Price
$30.56
Change
-$0.14 (-0.46%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
81.73B
72 days until earnings call
FANG
Price
$138.53
Change
-$0.82 (-0.59%)
Updated
May 20, 10:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.57B
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNQ vs FANG

Header iconCNQ vs FANG Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs FANGBanner chart's image
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$30.56
Change-$0.14 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.94M
Capitalization81.73B
Diamondback Energy
Price$138.53
Change-$0.82 (-0.59%)
Volume$100
Capitalization35.57B
CNQ vs FANG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. FANG commentary
May 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a Hold and FANG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CNQ: $30.56 vs. FANG: $139.35)
Brand notoriety: CNQ and FANG are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 43% vs. FANG: 55%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $81.73B vs. FANG: $35.57B
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $81.73B. FANG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $35.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNQ and FANG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.74% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.72% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($81.7B) has a higher market cap than FANG($35.6B). CNQ has higher P/E ratio than FANG: CNQ (13.95) vs FANG (11.50). CNQ YTD gains are higher at: -1.004 vs. FANG (-13.746). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.3B vs. FANG (6.17B). CNQ has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. FANG (582M). FANG has less debt than CNQ: FANG (6.8B) vs CNQ (10.8B). CNQ has higher revenues than FANG: CNQ (40.8B) vs FANG (8.34B).
CNQFANGCNQ / FANG
Capitalization81.7B35.6B229%
EBITDA17.3B6.17B280%
Gain YTD-1.004-13.7467%
P/E Ratio13.9511.50121%
Revenue40.8B8.34B489%
Total Cash1.4B582M241%
Total Debt10.8B6.8B159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs FANG: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1363
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2732
SMR RATING
1..100
4761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNQ's Valuation (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (47). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (32). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (61). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (60). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (78). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQFANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY594.850.65
+0.11%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X105606.180000-839.828100
-0.79%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL208.78-2.48
-1.17%
Apple
GME27.89-0.56
-1.97%
GameStop Corp
TSLA342.09-7.89
-2.25%
Tesla

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
-0.46%
BTE - CNQ
82%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
VET - CNQ
81%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
OBE - CNQ
77%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
FANG - CNQ
75%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
PR - CNQ
75%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
More

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-1.26%
PR - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
DVN - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
OVV - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
CHRD - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
COP - FANG
87%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More