CNQ
Price
$34.35
Change
+$0.25 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
71.67B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EOG
Price
$105.32
Change
-$2.70 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
57.15B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNQ vs EOG

Header iconCNQ vs EOG Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs EOGBanner chart's image
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$34.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.73%)
Volume$6.68M
Capitalization71.67B
EOG Resources
Price$105.32
Change-$2.70 (-2.50%)
Volume$5.65M
Capitalization57.15B
CNQ vs EOG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. EOG commentary
Jan 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a Hold and EOG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2026
Stock price -- (CNQ: $34.35 vs. EOG: $105.32)
Brand notoriety: CNQ and EOG are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 79% vs. EOG: 153%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $71.67B vs. EOG: $57.15B
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $71.67B. EOG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $57.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $121.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than EOG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EOG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EOG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the short-term than EOG.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +7.08% price change this week, while EOG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

EOG is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.13% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($71.7B) has a higher market cap than EOG($57.1B). CNQ has higher P/E ratio than EOG: CNQ (15.05) vs EOG (10.46). CNQ YTD gains are higher at: 1.477 vs. EOG (1.251). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5B vs. EOG (11.5B). EOG has more cash in the bank: 5.27B vs. CNQ (113M). EOG has less debt than CNQ: EOG (8.13B) vs CNQ (17.3B). CNQ has higher revenues than EOG: CNQ (44.5B) vs EOG (22.6B).
CNQEOGCNQ / EOG
Capitalization71.7B57.1B126%
EBITDA17.5B11.5B152%
Gain YTD1.4771.251118%
P/E Ratio15.0510.46144%
Revenue44.5B22.6B197%
Total Cash113M5.27B2%
Total Debt17.3B8.13B213%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs EOG: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
EOG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3631
SMR RATING
1..100
5148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EOG's Valuation (71) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (77). This means that EOG’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

EOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (36). This means that EOG’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

EOG's SMR Rating (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (51). This means that EOG’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EOG (58). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to EOG’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EOG (58). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to EOG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQEOG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EOG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMDG30.461.01
+3.43%
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
BERZ2.66N/A
N/A
MicroSectors™ St FANG&Inn 3X Inv Ld ETNs
HEGD25.45-0.01
-0.05%
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
FNDE37.75-0.28
-0.74%
Schwab Fundamental Emerging MarketsEqETF
CANC36.28-0.36
-0.98%
Tema Oncology ETF

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with MGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then MGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
+0.73%
MGY - CNQ
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
VET - CNQ
79%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
OVV - CNQ
79%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
CHRD - CNQ
78%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
EOG - CNQ
77%
Closely correlated
-1.57%
More

EOG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EOG has been closely correlated with MGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EOG jumps, then MGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EOG
1D Price
Change %
EOG100%
-1.57%
MGY - EOG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
DVN - EOG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
OVV - EOG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
CHRD - EOG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
MUR - EOG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More