Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPIX vs RMQHX
CNPIX vs RMQHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPIX vs. RMQHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPIX is a Hold and RMQHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 965M vs. CNPIX (3.76M). CNPIX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: CNPIX (1.58) vs RMQHX (0.20). CNPIX was incepted earlier than RMQHX: CNPIX (22 years) vs RMQHX (11 years). CNPIX (2.54) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.80). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. CNPIX (173.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPIX: RMQHX (2500) vs CNPIX (15000). RMQHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.38 vs. CNPIX (-5.90). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 117.18 vs. CNPIX (8.80).
| CNPIX | RMQHX | CNPIX / RMQHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.27 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.80 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.325 | 31.020 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 15000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.76M | 965M | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.20 | 810% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.90 | 13.38 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.53 | 201.78 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 117.18 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.30 | 1168.26 | 7% |