Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFIX
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.47
Change-$1.20 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$20.18
Change-$0.17 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.15M
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. ZGFIX (449M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPFX (0.61) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) and CNPFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. CNPFX (13.17). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 53.40 vs. CNPFX (33.54).
| CNPFX | ZGFIX | CNPFX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.390 | 15.625 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 449M | 36,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.20 | 303% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.17 | 15.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.28 | 47.25 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.54 | 53.40 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement