Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFIX
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.61
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.99
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.52M
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ZGFIX (445M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPFX (0.65) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) and CNPFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. CNPFX (11.32). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 60.33 vs. CNPFX (47.85).
| CNPFX | ZGFIX | CNPFX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.031 | 13.580 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 445M | 35,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.20 | 322% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 15.61 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 50.36 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.85 | 60.33 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement