Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFIX
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$20.23
Change+$0.19 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.34M
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZGFIX (454M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPFX (0.62) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) and CNPFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.21 vs. CNPFX (12.86). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. CNPFX (36.93).
| CNPFX | ZGFIX | CNPFX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.226 | 14.943 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 454M | 35,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.20 | 309% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 15.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.24 | 60.66 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 55.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.65 | N/A | - |