Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFIX
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.76M
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ZGFIX (448M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPFX (0.65) vs ZGFIX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). ZGFIX (0.87) and CNPFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX (17.85) and CNPFX (17.12) have marching annual gain over last year. ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 56.27 vs. CNPFX (44.62).
| CNPFX | ZGFIX | CNPFX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.745 | 13.239 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 448M | 35,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.20 | 322% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 17.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.52 | 45.67 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.62 | 56.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement