Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$20.14
Change+$0.18 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.34M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZGFAX (454M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.62) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.22 vs. CNPFX (12.86). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.42 vs. CNPFX (36.93).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.226 | 14.889 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 454M | 35,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.20 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 15.22 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.24 | 59.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 53.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement