Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$18.86
Change-$1.28 (-6.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets476.59M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZGFAX (477M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (1.17) vs ZGFAX (0.70). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.86) and CNPFX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. ZGFAX (5.52). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.47 vs. CNPFX (18.03).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.86 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.86 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -1.873 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 477M | 34,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.70 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 5.52 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 27.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 34.47 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers