Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.61
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.52M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ZGFAX (445M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.65) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. CNPFX (11.32). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.56 vs. CNPFX (47.85).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.031 | 13.520 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 445M | 35,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.20 | 320% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 15.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 49.42 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.85 | 58.56 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement