Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets471.95M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZGFAX (472M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.61) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. ZGFAX (8.48). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.56 vs. CNPFX (22.53).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.92 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.399 | 10.211 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 472M | 34,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.20 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | 8.48 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.09 | 41.57 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 39.56 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement