Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.47
Change-$1.20 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$20.09
Change-$0.17 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.15M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. ZGFAX (449M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.61) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX (15.18) and CNPFX (14.74) have marching annual gain over last year. ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.80 vs. CNPFX (35.75).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.367 | 15.573 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 449M | 36,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.20 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | 15.18 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 46.53 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 51.80 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement