Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.67
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.71B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.25M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. WAGSX (12.3M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (0.61) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.74 vs. WAGSX (-3.53). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. WAGSX (-10.56).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.367 | 1.740 | 1,228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 12.3M | 1,341,463% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | -3.53 | -417% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 23.17 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | -10.56 | -339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement