Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WAGSX (12.4M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (0.62) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. WAGSX (-1.28). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.93 vs. WAGSX (-6.85).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.226 | 2.568 | 749% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 12.4M | 1,314,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | -1.28 | -1,008% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.24 | 38.02 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | -6.85 | -539% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement