Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.01
Change-$2.66 (-3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.16
Change-$0.40 (-3.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.35M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WAGSX (12.4M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (1.17) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. WAGSX (-6.17). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.03 vs. WAGSX (-15.79).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.36 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.57 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | -0.977 | -165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 12.4M | 1,314,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | -6.17 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 13.96 | 299% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | -15.79 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement