Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs SCGVX
CNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.02
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$32.38
Change+$0.15 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets908.96M
CNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. SCGVX (909M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: CNPFX (0.61) vs SCGVX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: CNPFX (23 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: CNPFX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.10 vs. SCGVX (-2.18). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.31 vs. SCGVX (-15.32).
| CNPFX | SCGVX | CNPFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.297 | 10.625 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 909M | 17,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.10 | -2.18 | -556% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.79 | 43.59 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.31 | -15.32 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.72 | 81.61 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement