Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs SCGVX
CNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.47
Change-$1.20 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$31.81
Change-$0.84 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.02M
CNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. SCGVX (903M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: CNPFX (0.61) vs SCGVX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: CNPFX (23 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: CNPFX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.17 vs. SCGVX (2.64). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.54 vs. SCGVX (-10.69).
| CNPFX | SCGVX | CNPFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.390 | 11.548 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 903M | 18,272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.17 | 2.64 | 499% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.28 | 44.92 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.54 | -10.69 | -314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.21 | 87.96 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement