Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGTFX
CNPFX vs RGTFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGTFX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.74
Change+$0.08 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.97B
American Funds Global Growth Port R5E
Price$26.25
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.9B
CNPFX vs RGTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGTFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and RGTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGTFX (6.9B). RGTFX pays higher dividends than CNPFX: RGTFX (0.77) vs CNPFX (0.64). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGTFX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGTFX (10 years). CNPFX (0.84) is less costly to investors than RGTFX (0.59). CNPFX (250) and RGTFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.12 vs. CNPFX (17.81). RGTFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.43 vs. CNPFX (39.08).
| CNPFX | RGTFX | CNPFX / RGTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.59 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.59 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.409 | 16.630 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 6.9B | 2,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.81 | 19.12 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 44.06 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.08 | 42.43 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement