Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.47
Change-$1.20 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.85
Change-$0.37 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.2M
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. RGPAX (501M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (0.61) vs RGPAX (0.35). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.74 vs. RGPAX (13.26). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. RGPAX (33.60).
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 8.20 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.367 | 17.061 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 501M | 32,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.35 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | 13.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 44.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 33.60 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement