Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$24.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets496.63M
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. RGPAX (497M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (0.61) vs RGPAX (0.34). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. CNPFX (11.68). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.40 vs. CNPFX (22.46).
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 8.20 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.333 | 17.303 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 497M | 32,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.34 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.68 | 14.91 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.35 | 49.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.46 | 29.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers