Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs PGRCX
CNPFX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
CNPFX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. PGRCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a StrongBuy and PGRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. PGRCX (1.03B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: CNPFX (0.65) vs PGRCX (0.02). CNPFX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: CNPFX (23 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: CNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. PGRCX (-5.95). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.18 vs. PGRCX (9.74).
| CNPFX | PGRCX | CNPFX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.89 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.89 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.502 | 8.398 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 1.03B | 15,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.02 | 4,003% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | -5.95 | -231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.92 | 3.89 | 924% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.18 | 9.74 | 412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 15.31 | 647% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement