Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs PGRCX
CNPFX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$71.45
Change+$0.37 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.61B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$56.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
CNPFX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. PGRCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. PGRCX (1.03B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: CNPFX (0.64) vs PGRCX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: CNPFX (23 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: CNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.91 vs. PGRCX (-6.18). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.61 vs. PGRCX (12.89).
| CNPFX | PGRCX | CNPFX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.89 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.89 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.710 | 10.035 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.03B | 15,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | -6.18 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.32 | 25.24 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.61 | 12.89 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.48 | 27.49 | 453% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement