Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs OWLSX
CNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$22.19
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.75B
CNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. OWLSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a StrongBuy and OWLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. OWLSX (25.8B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPFX (0.65) vs OWLSX (0.38). CNPFX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPFX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.57 vs. OWLSX (11.30). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.89 vs. CNPFX (40.10).
| CNPFX | OWLSX | CNPFX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.437 | 11.901 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 25.8B | 616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.38 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.57 | 11.30 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 42.30 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.10 | 47.89 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.33 | 77.15 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement