Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs NBSSX
CNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$36.34
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets819.72M
CNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. NBSSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and NBSSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. NBSSX (820M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPFX (0.62) vs NBSSX (0.10). CNPFX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPFX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. CNPFX (12.86). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.93 vs. NBSSX (24.80).
| CNPFX | NBSSX | CNPFX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.226 | 19.579 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 820M | 19,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.10 | 640% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 18.62 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.24 | 85.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 24.80 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.65 | 42.59 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement