Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs NBSSX
CNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$73.02
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$36.37
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets811.63M
CNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. NBSSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. NBSSX (812M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPFX (0.61) vs NBSSX (0.10). CNPFX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPFX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. CNPFX (11.65). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. NBSSX (21.82).
| CNPFX | NBSSX | CNPFX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.341 | 19.908 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 812M | 20,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.10 | 641% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 16.25 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.63 | 71.49 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.42 | 21.82 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.09 | 39.86 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement